Prohibiting Dog Breed Specific Laws: Fair or Turning a Blind Eye?

A new law signed by Gov. Deval Patrick would prevent cities and towns from instituting breed specific dog rules.

Is it common sense to allow cities and towns to pass rules specific to certain dog breeds, such as pit bulls, in the name of public safety? Or do they unfairly target certain dogs?

Last week, Gov. Deval Patrick signed an animal rights bill that takes effect Nov. 1 and includes a stipulation prohibiting cities and towns from creating breed specific rules at the local level.

The move has angered some Boston officials, the Boston Herald reports, as the new state law would negate the city's "Responsible Pit Bull Ownership" ordinance that, among other rules, requires pit bull owners to keep their dogs muzzled when off the owner's private property. Boston adopted the ordinance in 2004 after several pit bull attacks in the city captured officials' attention.

Other cities have also wrangled over how to deal with a perceived issue regarding pit bulls and public safety. 

The Best Friends Animal Society says that about half of the dogs killed in shelters today are pit bulls or pit bull mixes, and that there are 20 different species of dogs that are commonly confused with pit bulls, thus making breed-discriminatory rules hard to enforce. The Humane Society of the United States says that in media-reported animal cruelty cases, dogs and in particular pit bulls are the most common victims of animal cruelty.

On the other hand, DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims' group, says that from 2006 to 2008, pit bulls accounted for 59 percent of all fatal dog attacks in the U.S. The next highest breed, rottweilers, accounted for 14 percent of those deaths.

Is the new state law prohibiting breed specific local ordinances turning a blind eye to a problem? Or do those types of rules unfairly target a specific breed and punish dogs for having bad owners? Tell us what you think in the comments below.

(Editor's note: This article is published to several Patch sites north of Boston.) 

Mel Cross August 30, 2012 at 01:02 AM
Holly any opinion on goats?
holly gwynn August 30, 2012 at 01:13 AM
They eat tin cans. Ban them immediately.
Mel Cross August 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM
But they are recycling..........
nina mitch September 05, 2012 at 12:55 PM
I agree Clay. Dogbites.org is just a witch hunt. I came across an interesting blog that shows the people behind dogbites and cravens, these people like to threaten and harass people. Also, as the blog shows, provoke. They are the ones lying and on a witch hunt, sad really is http://www.whoiscolleenlynn.com/sycophants.html
Lydia September 27, 2012 at 12:47 PM
excellent article Rob; thanks for the link. I especially appreciated the statement from one of the studies: "Strategies known to result in decreased bite incidents include active enforcement of dog control ordinances (ticketing)". Animal Control is good, but enforcement does seem to be lacking in certain areas....


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »