This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

September 16, 2013: Medicare In the News

Obamacare vs. Medicare: It's almost impossible to pick up a newspaper the last two weeks without reading a breathless story warning seniors not to buy insurance on a healthcare exchange (which is a fancy name for web site) such as the Massachusetts Healthcare Insurance Connector--see NOTE.  I wrote a post about this subject last month entitled "On Medicare? Don't Worry about Obamacare," but just in case it's not clear: "If you are on Medicare, forget about Obamacare."  (I find these reminders insulting so sorry if I insulted you by repeating the obvious.)

Medicare Is Welfare: Another story making the rounds in the mainstream press in the last few days -- based on some very dubious research out of the Harvard School of Public Health -- basically claims that Medicare is welfare, that we seniors are not paying our fair share. Specifically the stories claim that seniors get $3 in benefits for every $1 contributed to the Medicare trust funds. Harvard itself didn't do the $3 for $1 research but references the New York Times, which in turn references some old data from an organization called the Urban Institute (that's why I call the Harvard research dubious; no respectable research would reference a newspaper).

Don't believe these news articles:

  • If you worked for 45-50 years like those of us just now retiring, you paid for your Medicare through both Medicare payroll taxes and income taxes.  
  • If you are a little older, you paid through your income taxes and your Medicare payroll taxes for the years that you worked that Medicare existed. Your insurance was subsidized a little bit by government funding -- but not $3 for $1 -- and that's the way LBJ, Wilbur Mills and Senator Kerr designed Medicare. The option would have been to wait until we baby boomers retired before the payouts began.
  • If you are on Medicare because you are disabled, you probably still contributed at some point and that's the way insurance is supposed to work: some people need insurance sooner than others and I am sure you are not happy you are one of those that needed it sooner.
  • And almost all of us are still paying at the rate of over $100 a month
.
What I think: I can't figure out what this Harvard you-seniors-didn't-pay-for-Medicare propaganda campaign is all about but don't believe it. And I find these constant reminders about Medicare vs. Obamacare insulting. We seniors have been using a web site to get different Medicare options for years. We understand that many non-seniors sign up for their healthcare insurance this time of year. We have been paying our fair share. I almost believe the government is trying to confuse us seniors.

NOTE: These web sites have different names in different states.
We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?