Prohibiting Dog Breed Specific Laws: Fair or Turning a Blind Eye?
A new law signed by Gov. Deval Patrick would prevent cities and towns from instituting breed specific dog rules.
Is it common sense to allow cities and towns to pass rules specific to certain dog breeds, such as pit bulls, in the name of public safety? Or do they unfairly target certain dogs?
Last week, Gov. Deval Patrick signed an animal rights bill that takes effect Nov. 1 and includes a stipulation prohibiting cities and towns from creating breed specific rules at the local level.
The move has angered some Boston officials, the Boston Herald reports, as the new state law would negate the city's "Responsible Pit Bull Ownership" ordinance that, among other rules, requires pit bull owners to keep their dogs muzzled when off the owner's private property. Boston adopted the ordinance in 2004 after several pit bull attacks in the city captured officials' attention.
Other cities have also wrangled over how to deal with a perceived issue regarding pit bulls and public safety.
The Best Friends Animal Society says that about half of the dogs killed in shelters today are pit bulls or pit bull mixes, and that there are 20 different species of dogs that are commonly confused with pit bulls, thus making breed-discriminatory rules hard to enforce. The Humane Society of the United States says that in media-reported animal cruelty cases, dogs and in particular pit bulls are the most common victims of animal cruelty.
On the other hand, DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims' group, says that from 2006 to 2008, pit bulls accounted for 59 percent of all fatal dog attacks in the U.S. The next highest breed, rottweilers, accounted for 14 percent of those deaths.
Is the new state law prohibiting breed specific local ordinances turning a blind eye to a problem? Or do those types of rules unfairly target a specific breed and punish dogs for having bad owners? Tell us what you think in the comments below.
(Editor's note: This article is published to several Patch sites north of Boston.)
Clay Hund
2:23 pm on Saturday, August 25, 2012
Poor research. They use dogsbite.org as a legit source, when it is a largely discredited source by all reputable canine organizations. not one trusted canine group agrees with anything that dogsbite.org has to say, as it is anti-pit bull lobbyist group, which was founded by some nutcase with no canine experience whatsoever. The founder, Colleen Lynn, is a dog bit victim, of what she thinks (not sure) was a pit bull, and is on a mission of revenge. She is a web designer that created a professional looking website, as that is her area of expertise, and posts way over-inflated stats, which are all lies. On top of that, she uses victims as pawns to fund her mission, which pulls at the heartstrings of people, rather than logic. She has reported in 2010, that 22 pit bulls killed people, when an official investigation was conducted by the National Canine Research Council, only 2 of those dogs were confirmed to be pit bulls, which were really mixes (mutts). Poor research on behalf of the Patch.
Restrictions focus on the symptoms of the disease, not a cure. The real issue with pit bulls are that fact that it is a very popular dog in the US, and that many people desire them for status and crime, and teach their dogs to be menaces. Most people I know that have pit bulls, are normal everyday people, who are animal lovers, and none of them have pit bulls that are a menace. Let's start focusing on the real issues, rather than making restrictions that do not solve the issues.
Josh Crawford
6:04 pm on Saturday, August 25, 2012
I could not agree with Clay more in regards to the use of dogsbite.org as a legitimate source. I have both owned a pit bull and volunteered for the past two years at a dog shelter working primarily with pits. As a general rule, pits make fantastic pets, and of all the breeds I've worked with that have been abused and come in with bad attitudes, pit bulls bounce back and respond to training better than any other breed.
Breed specific legislation is a classic example of addressing an effect, not a cause. Dogs in many ways are like children, very few are born "evil" but if raised poorly, abused or otherwise mistreated, act out. Punishing pit bulls, rather than bad owners, municipalities like Boston where I live, once again deflect personal responsibility and blame a blanket group. In this case the breed commonly referred to as "Pit Bulls"
David KEnt
1:08 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Josh,
Here’s a line of reasoning that I’d appreciate some comment on. Perhaps it has merit, perhaps I need correcting:
Often, it only takes a small portion of a population to cause that population to be generally dangerous. I remember back when Washington DC was the murder capital of the country. I read an article quoting a resident of a dangerous neighborhood as saying something like “The vast majority of residents here are law abiding”. Sure, but the 1% or 2% that was not law abiding made those neighborhoods dangerous. We hear similar comments about fundamentalist Moslem populations in the Middle East whose members, by and large, are not dangerous. But these populations still contain enough members that ARE dangerous to make the population dangerous overall.
Aren’t Pits similar? That is, isn’t the breed a bunch of largely great dogs but with enough of a dangerous minority to make the breed dangerous overall?
Finally, I don’t think I can buy your cause vs. effect argument because all breeds experience the bad ownership.
Lucy Muir
3:47 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
The NCRC is a pit bull advocacy group whose only goal is to questions statistics much as the Tobacco lobby did for so long with cancer studies. Karen Delise who contests the IDs of dogs from official police investigations is a former vet tech.
She and the others are suggesting that police departments, which are tasked with investigating all homicides, cannot determine the breed of a dog. Ridiculous.
Daniel DeMaina
10:17 pm on Monday, August 27, 2012
Hey Clay, Josh—thanks for the feedback. I've heard similar feedback from people who questioned my use of that site as a source. I went searching for somebody to offset my use of The Best Friends Animal Society and The Humane Society of the United States, who are obviously both on the other side of the fence, and found several citations of DogsBite.org.
While reputable canine organizations may have called the site into question, those organizations also have their own particular bias (although of course, you can have a viewpoint one way or the other while still maintaining fidelity to facts). Later, our trusty Patch users (I'm on the North Shore, by the way, where this article ran over this past weekend) started calling into question some of the statistics on the site.
Part of what makes "the Patch" great is you guys all jumping in and sometimes calling us on the carpet, so I appreciate the criticism and pointing out where you find what you consider flawed methodology. All it does is help us get closer to the truth, and I appreciate it.
nina mitch
8:55 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012
I agree Clay. Dogbites.org is just a witch hunt. I came across an interesting blog that shows the people behind dogbites and cravens, these people like to threaten and harass people. Also, as the blog shows, provoke. They are the ones lying and on a witch hunt, sad really is
http://www.whoiscolleenlynn.com/sycophants.html
Glen
6:56 pm on Saturday, August 25, 2012
Walking a dog with a leash and collar - barbaric. Walking a dog with a bag full of dog mess - subhuman. Prohibit dog fouling in MV.
malcolm nichols
7:40 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
But according to Barack they are delicious.
Patrick Ryan
8:38 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
A dog is a domesticated wild animal even a wolf can be trained . That being said,,you never know when a dog will bite, or who, or for what reason. The emergency roon has at least 2 or 3 dog bite victims a day ,all dogs bite even the sweetest dog in the world..A pitbull has jaws and teeth that kill . What trigers a dog to bite, is a primitive center in the dogs brain, a certain scent , so to speak trigers the dogs defensive attacking mechinism, all the training in the world will not stop a dog from biting.There are too many mangled childrens faces, not to ban the pit bull breed,and other large potentialy dangerous dog breeds, in places where children and mothers gather, and that goes for any 175 lb dog, that can't be controled by its dog walker, If you want statistics take them from the countrys emergency rooms, not dog shelters. and by the way I love dogs too,.when you go to the playground you should leave your dog at home,You can never tell which child or mother is giving off the bitting scent I can't tell you how many times, I've heard, but my dog never bites, after hes bitten someone.
Mike Pfaff
10:00 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
I 4 dogs, one of which is a PitBull. The only problem I have had with dogs and kids is kids throwing rocks and sticks and otherwise tormenting my dogs, This happens all the time and is how most kids get bitten other than just running up to strange dogs and getting in their faces. Parents of the children need to train their kids and take responsibility for them. This would include learning about dogs and teaching their kids that these behaviors are not acceptable. If one of my dogs ends up biting one of these rotten little monsters I'll be on the dog's side all the way.
lulu
9:35 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Responsible pit bull owners?! Okay, of course we have responsible dog owners, of ALL breeds. What worries me, and why we have (had) laws and/or ordinances regarding pit bulls is for those owners who have no business owning any dogs, let alone a pit bull. I see many (wanna be) gangster, up to no good, been in trouble with the law regarding drugs, violence, people walking around... and why is it, their pet of choice just happens to be PIT BULLS?!!
We don't place those laws for the law abiding citizens, who keep up with their animals shots & vet visits, and behavioral issues..... come on guys, that's not what those against pit bull ownership are referring to.....
Rob Leinberger
9:44 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Breed specific legislation/law is nothing more than a knee jerk reaction. It puts undue pressure on responsible dog owners as well as the animal control officers attempting to enforce it. A better study, that was released in April 2012, was done by the AVMA. It's titled, " Dog Bite Risk and Prevention: The Role of Breed." The direct link is: https://www.avma.org/KB/Resources/Backgrounders/Pages/The-Role-of-Breed-in-Dog-Bite-Risk-and-Prevention.aspx
Lucy Muir
3:50 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Regulation is always a result of some people being irresponsible and it always affects responsible people, but it always is necessary because of the irresponsible owners.
Many people were judicious in operating cars before speed limits became widespread. They traveled more slowly in bad conditions and traffic and only travelled faster when it was safe to do so. They were treated 'unfairly' when speed limits came into effect. But, so what. speed limits save lves and that is more important that the feelings of the "responsible" drivers.
Lydia
8:47 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
excellent article Rob; thanks for the link. I especially appreciated the statement from one of the studies: "Strategies known to result in decreased bite incidents include active enforcement of dog control ordinances (ticketing)". Animal Control is good, but enforcement does seem to be lacking in certain areas....
The Pit Crew
10:08 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Banning a breed is the same reaction to being scared of something or someone as Jim Crow. This banning is more race related than anything! The problem is that those wanting to ban didn't realize the many different types of owners, responsible that is, there are.
For over ten years I've been in contact with this breed & I'm still alive to write about it!
If we Ban "Pit Bulls" let's also ban the following:
Parents (they leave their kids to die in hot cars, 23 just this year)
Cars - Obviously they have killed more people than dogs & are not owned by humans!
Swimming Pools - Left lone with children they are likely to kill them....
Let's work on teaching people proper dog care, dog behavior and how to raise dogs & kids!
Peace & Pit Bulls,
The Pit Crew
Houston, TX
DONNY3666
10:45 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Some years back I was working in saugus when i saw a pit bull on top of an old lady. I Grabbed a shovel and ran to the incident and had to beat off the dog with a shovel.
It turned out that that the old lady was walking on the street and found a baby bird that fell out of a nest. The dog got wind of it and jumped over a 5' fence and attacked the old lady. She was in shock and squashed the bird to death.. Then i lifted her arms up to see the bites. I saw the bones on the top of her fore armes. I'm sure the lady lived, but i never followed up to find out the full extent of her damages.
What i learned was you never know what will turn a pit bull on and getting them off a victim is no easy chore.
sharp
10:34 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
I was bit by a pit bull. My own. That may not sound good, but it was while we were walking & a Boxer mix that was running loose came after us. My dog was protecting me & herself. Of course, I was protecting her & didn't want her to get injured any more than she already was. So in attempting to break up the dogs I was bitten. I needed medical attention. I was not the intended victim. Neither dog ever intended to bite me. They were going after each other. But when I went to the ER, I reported dog bite & they had to report it. On a piece of paper all it says is "dog bite, pit bull, boxer." So while I know the real story & Statistics are just numbers, that can NEVER tell the whole story. Emma's 6-7 yrs. old & isn't mean or dangerous towards people. She's a terrible guard dog. But I found out she's protective when another dog charges @ us. I have 6 dogs, different mixtures & sizes in our family. She gets along w/all of them. It's my Beagle/Jack Russell who has the attitude problem. LOL! So to put a ban on "entire" Breed, is wrong. To say Emma is exactly like another pittie IS Wrong, b/c anotherowner hasn't socialized their pittie or they let their pittie live their life chained to a tree & doesn't know love & discipline. That dog needs help not death. ALL dogs can be dangerous in the hands of the wrong owners. I see it everyday. I'm not stupid enough to say my dog(s) will never bite, but I will say my Emma is not like every other pit bull in America.
DONNY3666
10:52 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Your lucky a child wasn't walking the dog.
The Pit Crew
11:03 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
NO, DONNY3666, not lucky responsible!
theresa h
11:10 am on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Sharp, I completely agree with you! My Chelsea was not like any other pit bull in America, either! I adopted my Chelsea from a pound in Chicopee, MA many years ago. She was amongst a population of dogs that was 90% pit/ pit mix vs. 10% other breeds at the time. She was a love bug and loved all humans. She had issues with some dogs, but then some dogs had issues with her though she was fine with them. When my partner and I introduced our dogs to each other, Chelsea was about 3 yrs old and 50 lbs and his beagle was about 4 yrs old and 30 lbs. They met on Chelsea's turf and the beagle had Chelsea on her back and submissive immediately. No fighting; that was just how it was and how they got along until the death of our beloved beagle. We eventually adopted another dog (foxhound mix) and again, Chelsea allowed the other dog to be the alpha. Chelsea never bit anyone in the 12 yrs I had her. Everyone she met loved her!
Someday, I would love to have another pittie. They are sweet and family oriented dogs if raised properly. It is we humans that treat them WRONG and cause them to behave in such a way that lends itself to a bad reputation. We shouldn't be outlawing specific breads! We should be educating (the dogs AND their humans) and socializing our dogs regularly and disciplining those who use dogs for fighting unlawful activities. Why do we continuously blame the animal for something we humans do?? The humans are the ones who should be held accountable!
Jaime
2:41 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
@DavidKent: I'm not trying to be rude, but your logic is seriously flawed. You claim if a small percentage of of a population are dangerous (Muslims, pit bull type dogs, etc) then it follows that the entire group should be considered to be dangerous. Following your logic would mean that since most (if not all) rapists are men, then we should assume that all men are rapists; since the majority of people in prison are black, then every black person must be a criminal; since most prostitutes are women, then all women must be prostitutes - do you honestly believe this makes sense? It does not - not logically, not statistically, not mathematically, not in an y way. Pit bull dogs are no more dangerous nor likely to bite or attack than any other kind of dog,period. CREDIBLE sources- ethologists, veterinarians, zoologists, animal behavioralists, dog trainers, etc, who have years of experience, training, knowledge and education all say so. These should be the experts relied upon when making policy that affects everyone, not the opinions of web designers, sports writers, politicians or lawyers who all have only their own self interests in mind and all of whom lack any real knowledge of animals. Educate yourself please, before spreading such ridiculous and harmful "facts."
Nicole
7:39 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
Patrick Ryan - seriously??? There is NO SUCH THING as a 175 pound pit bull. Occasionally you may see one at 85 pounds, but that's pretty rare. Pit bull type dogs aren't even as big as Labs; they average 50 pounds, and can even be as small as 30 pounds. 175 - REALLY? You obviously don't know a pit bull from a St Bernard. Some people will believe anything, I guess. Santa Claus, anyone? Sheesh.
Ben Abbey
10:04 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
I'm sure Pits can be great pets for the right person. While I try to teach my kids to approach each dog delicately, there is no way I will let them near a Pit or Rotti.. not happening. I saw a brother and sister Pit get loose, run the streets in Hyannis and made it to my backyard where they tore through a rabbit hutch killing both rabbits. Completely on their own, no one dared to approach them, including the police. Yes, all dogs can bite, but with the breed tenencies and lock jaws, why would I want to subject my kids to that? or expose my self to a law suit by getting a higher risk breed? I'll stick to our labs....
The Pit Crew
10:22 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012
@Ben , first "lock jaw" is a myth. What prey driven animal could survive if its jaw locked? This pure proof of someone not getting nature!
Funny, but I'd imagine many a breed would eat rabbits! I find it interesting, these dogs, tore through the neighborhood hell bent on killing and the only thing they killed is something nature serves them as prey! I'm sorry for the loss of your rabbits! However, this was not a breed issue! This was a prey driven animal issue. Furthermore a prey driven animal that obviously had NO ONE taking care of it!
People kill me with the big mean pit bull killed a cat,rabbit etc...all dogs of a certain size can and do, do this!
Again, the issue is human lack of knowledge and action!
(PS; the story goes that ignorant humans who wanted both dog aggressive dogs & human aggressive dogs, bred in labs!)
(PPS: Many people mistake my chocolate & black pits as labs! So, when they try to ban them either I will get away with having labs or your labs will fall into the get rid of it line!)
YOU PICK!! I'll stick to you keep yours & leave mine alone!
MRegan
3:31 pm on Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Wow, just goes to show ignorance comes at all levels! I have had to rehome my pit bulls because we are moving to a Pit Bull ban town, and it's ridiculous, & why were they banned not because they have had any issues but because they've been told they were "bad" just like through the years Rotts were, and the German Shepherds, Dobermans etc, I also had two minature Dachshunds that have killed kittens, chickens, birds but would never even think of biting a human lets ban them too, heck before you know it they will of banned every dog breed because at some point in history each breed of dog has bitten someone or killed something! Most dogs have been bred for a purpose, the Pit Bulls these dogs were used as catch dogs for semi-wild cattle and hogs, Basset Hounds to hunt rabbits, Dachshunds badgers, Labs used to fetch dead animals etc etc. I live in a very small community we don't have the gang issues or dog fighting issues. Our bans are based on stupidity! If you as a parent are not responsible enough to teach your child to respect an animal or take action when witnessing illegal use of an animal or neglect then you yourself are the problem! I myself have begun a petition in the state of Kansas to get breed specific bans terminated! By the way if anyone believes that they have the perfect breed of dog because theirs isnt on the NAUGHTY LIST you are just as ignorant as the morans that make the laws, ANY dog has the potiental of being aggressive not just Pits!
holly gwynn
11:01 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Babies & Children Bite People, sometimes causing serious injury & psychological damage. Lets legislate baby-bans.
(silly, right? this is the exact same as breed bans)
holly gwynn
11:04 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Violent crime is sometimes commited by black people. Lets legislate a ban on minorities.
(outrageous & disgusting right? EXACT SAME THING AS BREED BANS)
holly gwynn
11:07 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Drug Addicts / Mentally ill people / Homeless people could attack at any time. Let's ban them from barnstable, and send those that dont comply to be euthanized.
(a repulsive notion? EXACT SAME THING AS BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION!)
Mel Cross
9:02 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Holly any opinion on goats?
holly gwynn
9:13 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012
They eat tin cans. Ban them immediately.
Mel Cross
8:20 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012
But they are recycling..........